Gentle readers,
In my prolonged absence, I've done more reading than I have since my days in secondary school. I wish I could promise you some sort of upcoming masterpiece, but to be honest, I've been so completely uninspired by Hollywood that I cannot even manage the effort to hate some of their thoughtless drivel. I haven't even been to see the new Friday the 13th film. I did, however, see that 'The Day the Earth Stood Still' remake, but it was not anything noteworthy in either direction, so I passed.
However, this past Friday, while reading (one of) my local newspapers, I stumbled across this hot little number on the front page of the Arts & Life section: 'Last House a Vile Remake; Parents take revenge on thugs for attack on their daughter.' What a gem! What a work of journalistic splendor! Here are a few of my favorite parts:
'Director Dennis Iliadis' version retains the same basic story - a couple of teenage girls on the hunt for pot get abducted and savagely attacked by psycopaths - but there's nothing particulatly special about it artistically.'
'Iliadis puts his vaguely unique spin on the proceedings by prolonging the most violent grotesque elements and making them more graphic. The result is never scary, but instead feels deplorably gratuitous'
'The physical showdown with the bad guys is wildly destructive, protracted and repetitive; rather than sucking you in, it'll' inspire you to look at your watch, wondering when it'll end.'
Oh boy, oh boy! Isn't that just a peach, ladies and gentlemen? I'm grinning as I'm typing this! Up next* (and I'm not entirely sure when that will be) is another of my favorites, Mel Brooks' 'The Producers' so just stick around. Or check back regularly. Who am I kidding?
* subject to change
Showing posts with label horror. Show all posts
Showing posts with label horror. Show all posts
Saturday, March 14, 2009
Monday, November 10, 2008
There were Nightmares on Church Street (8/10)
I was actually going to write this review for Quantum of Solace, but I'm not sure how I would put a high five into words.
Every small town has one of those nuts that never dies, because he lives on in our minds and in our stories. My town had this one guy, Chainsaw Charlie, but he was nothing in comparison to what the residents of this sleepy little town had to deal with.
Fred Kruger, the bastard son of a hundred maniacs, is a known child murderer, and as we find out very early on, hunts out his victims in their sleep. Freddy was my first horror movie monster aside from the Draculas and the mummies, and if he didn't scare the heck out of me, I don't know what could have! His design was exactly what it needed to be. He was dirty, poorly dressed, smug, and sinister with the most badass glove ever conceived.. He was a genius, and completely insane (who could blame him?) with a new twist on the slasher genre than has never been imitated since. Kruger is played by the master slasher himself, Robert Englund. This man was made to play the baddies, with his long, hooked nose and his tall, gaunt figure, he's exactly what Kruger should look like, I think. Without make-up on, he's the guy you would actually find in a small town, and in a way resembles my father. Which is unnerving, now that I'm thinking about it.
It is difficult to look at this movie with fresh eyes, after marathons of the series, rewatching just the first one and trying to remember back to when the monster wasn't bigger than the movie. The thing that always catches me off-guard when I watch this movie is the fact that what we see is what we get. This movie is a reminder as to why I absolutely adore movie makeup and special effects. This is all done without any CGI, it's all special effects and camera tricks. Heck yes.
The movie jumps so quickly into the action that it leaves me speechless. What? No big introduction? No warm up? No notice? Nope, just hop hop hop. Look, she's dreaming. Now she's dead. Now she's dead in real life! Hop hop hop. Two people are already dead before we even find out who and what Fred Kruger is. This is the kind of suspense that drives me absolutely nuts when watching movies. It is the kind of thing that drove me mad about watching this movie for the first time in my young teens, and after the credits had rolled, I was determined for a re-watch.
The boiler room is such an iconic scene of this series, and combined with the screeching of the clawed glove along the piping is almost maddening. The little tricks like this are what really make this movie. Kruger is an absolute terror with very little screen time, which just adds to the madness. The ending is a little over the top silliness, and for a moment, you think it is going to be a anti-climax and a good laugh, but it turns at just the right spot to give the audience a good chill. I give this movie 8/10, and a million high fives to Robert Englund.
Speaking of a re-watch, I just wanted to mention the 'reimagining' coming to the big screen in 2010. I just want to say that I disapprove whole-heartedly with this, as I do with all remakes, but this one especially cut me deep. Now, I can't say that I am at all surprised at this, because honestly, I cannot recall in the last decade one movie that has not been in some form or another based off of another movie or from a book. It was only a matter of time before they got down to the good stuff. Currently in production are remakes of 'A Nightmare on Elm Street', 'Friday the 13th', 'Evil Dead', And coming out in a matter of days is 'The Day the Earth Stood Still'. I mean, seriously? These movies have been done, were incredibly successful, and for the most part have had multiple sequels made for them. These ideas should be celebrated, not spat on and rebuilt for a new wad of cash for the overpaid workers of the industry. These movies have their place in history, and bringing them back with 'todays technology' is going to give us exactly what we've been seeing in theaters now -Lack of development and originality, sparsely painted over with CG and attractive ladies who have spent more time on their hair than a book- and this is going to deteriorate the original films.
I think what bothers me the most about this is the children who are going to flock to the theaters in folds to see the 'original stories behind Freddy Vs. Jason' or to watch Keanu Reeves in a new sci-fi. What are the chances they're even going to look up the original film once they're done? And even if they do, it'll be diluted with the memory of flashy special effects.
Don't get me wrong, sometimes remakes are important. Sometimes, promising stories need to be told in a different and better way. But it is such a rarity that the remake outdoes the original and to be honest, I can't think of such a case off of the top of my head. Oh well.
Every small town has one of those nuts that never dies, because he lives on in our minds and in our stories. My town had this one guy, Chainsaw Charlie, but he was nothing in comparison to what the residents of this sleepy little town had to deal with.
Fred Kruger, the bastard son of a hundred maniacs, is a known child murderer, and as we find out very early on, hunts out his victims in their sleep. Freddy was my first horror movie monster aside from the Draculas and the mummies, and if he didn't scare the heck out of me, I don't know what could have! His design was exactly what it needed to be. He was dirty, poorly dressed, smug, and sinister with the most badass glove ever conceived.. He was a genius, and completely insane (who could blame him?) with a new twist on the slasher genre than has never been imitated since. Kruger is played by the master slasher himself, Robert Englund. This man was made to play the baddies, with his long, hooked nose and his tall, gaunt figure, he's exactly what Kruger should look like, I think. Without make-up on, he's the guy you would actually find in a small town, and in a way resembles my father. Which is unnerving, now that I'm thinking about it.
It is difficult to look at this movie with fresh eyes, after marathons of the series, rewatching just the first one and trying to remember back to when the monster wasn't bigger than the movie. The thing that always catches me off-guard when I watch this movie is the fact that what we see is what we get. This movie is a reminder as to why I absolutely adore movie makeup and special effects. This is all done without any CGI, it's all special effects and camera tricks. Heck yes.
The movie jumps so quickly into the action that it leaves me speechless. What? No big introduction? No warm up? No notice? Nope, just hop hop hop. Look, she's dreaming. Now she's dead. Now she's dead in real life! Hop hop hop. Two people are already dead before we even find out who and what Fred Kruger is. This is the kind of suspense that drives me absolutely nuts when watching movies. It is the kind of thing that drove me mad about watching this movie for the first time in my young teens, and after the credits had rolled, I was determined for a re-watch.
The boiler room is such an iconic scene of this series, and combined with the screeching of the clawed glove along the piping is almost maddening. The little tricks like this are what really make this movie. Kruger is an absolute terror with very little screen time, which just adds to the madness. The ending is a little over the top silliness, and for a moment, you think it is going to be a anti-climax and a good laugh, but it turns at just the right spot to give the audience a good chill. I give this movie 8/10, and a million high fives to Robert Englund.
Speaking of a re-watch, I just wanted to mention the 'reimagining' coming to the big screen in 2010. I just want to say that I disapprove whole-heartedly with this, as I do with all remakes, but this one especially cut me deep. Now, I can't say that I am at all surprised at this, because honestly, I cannot recall in the last decade one movie that has not been in some form or another based off of another movie or from a book. It was only a matter of time before they got down to the good stuff. Currently in production are remakes of 'A Nightmare on Elm Street', 'Friday the 13th', 'Evil Dead', And coming out in a matter of days is 'The Day the Earth Stood Still'. I mean, seriously? These movies have been done, were incredibly successful, and for the most part have had multiple sequels made for them. These ideas should be celebrated, not spat on and rebuilt for a new wad of cash for the overpaid workers of the industry. These movies have their place in history, and bringing them back with 'todays technology' is going to give us exactly what we've been seeing in theaters now -Lack of development and originality, sparsely painted over with CG and attractive ladies who have spent more time on their hair than a book- and this is going to deteriorate the original films.
I think what bothers me the most about this is the children who are going to flock to the theaters in folds to see the 'original stories behind Freddy Vs. Jason' or to watch Keanu Reeves in a new sci-fi. What are the chances they're even going to look up the original film once they're done? And even if they do, it'll be diluted with the memory of flashy special effects.
Don't get me wrong, sometimes remakes are important. Sometimes, promising stories need to be told in a different and better way. But it is such a rarity that the remake outdoes the original and to be honest, I can't think of such a case off of the top of my head. Oh well.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
